Personal Blog Top Sites

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

The Problem of Freedom


“And what sort of chains of dependence could exist among men who possess nothing? I am chased from one tree, I am free to go to the next; if I am tormented in one place, who will prevent my moving somewhere else? Is there a man who is so much stronger than me and who is, moreover, depraved enough, lazy enough and fierce enough to compel me to provide for his sustenance while he remains idle? He must resolve not to lose sight of me for a single moment, and keep me cvery carefully bound while he sleeps, for fear that I should escape or kill him: that is to say, he is obliged to expose himself voluntarily to much worse trouble than the trouble he wishes to avoid, or gives to me....Withouth expanding uselessly on these details, anyone must see that since the bonds of servitude are formed only through the mutual dependence of men and the reciprocal needs that unite them, it is impossible to enslave a man without first putting him in a situation where he cannot do without another man...”
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau from “A Discourse On Inequality”

"Freedom" is one of those slippery words, difficult to define because it is an ambiguous and abstract man-made concept. It naturally occurs in nature, but only becomes an issue in the way that humans view themselves, their surroundings and others. Freedom is only an issue in the presence of oppression, and oppression only exists among humans as a result of their perceptions of the world around them. Freedom grants one the right to behave without fear or punishment i.e. go anywhere they wish, do anything they wish or say anything they wish. Of course there are always limits imposed on freedom. We are all born free, but as we grow we learn the physical limits of our surroundings. We learn about the limits imposed on us by gravity or by our physical surroundings such as walls. Then we learn about ethical boundries....often imposed on us by those raising us. “You can stay out until dark, “Don’t go to the ‘bad’ side of town,” and then moral boundries, “Poor people are no good lazy bums.”

After we form the skills of logic we think it right to do as we wish unless it imposes on anothers freedom. Unfortunately, we don’t usually consider this until somebody else imposes on our freedom. Then...the natural reaction is to make a law or rule that applies to all people, restricting them from certain behavior that happens to offend us...this is where defining freedom gets fuzzy, complicated, and society becomes more and more oppressive.

The thing is, freedom can only exist if you recognize its existence and then excercise it while at the same time acknowledging and tolerating others freedom.

“[W]hat is boasted of at the prestnt time as the revival of religion, is always, in narrow and uncultivated minds, at least as much the revival of bigotry; and where there is the strongest permanent leaven of intolerance in the feelings of a people, which at all times abides in the middle classes of this country, it needs but little to provoke them into actively persecuting those whom they have never ceased to think proper objects of persecution. For it is this-it is the opinions men entertain, and the feelings they cherish, respecting those who disown the beliefs they deem important, which makes this country not a place of mental freedom.”
-John Stewart Mill “On Freedom”

Likewise, if you voluntarily enslave yourself to the laws of society which bind you, then you are not free in the least. If you support laws that oppress others, then you yourself are not free, for those same laws apply to you as well. Freedom can only exist if we all practice it, and tolerate other’s freedom...and then...only if we practice it with responsiblity.

To do this we must learn to remove these man-made boundries which devide us...not just those of moral differences, but of geography as well. We must recognize and accept our physical boundries, and rid ourselves of these things called borders...ethnic boundries, economic boundries, etc. We must be united and equal, we must resist the urge to punish others for punishment is nothing more than oppression. As long as there are prisons, there will be no freedom. As long as there are judges, there will not be freedom. We are only free to judge ourselves, and restrict our own behavior...anything else is oppression.

When mankind has reached a point where we can all respect each other, and are logically educated enough to restrict our own actions that will obviously oppress others, and yet are able to tolerate others freedom to do as they wish as annoying as it may be, as long as it doesn’t harm us or inhibit our own developement, then we will all have freedom. If someones action harms, the only thing we can do is show the person through a logical argument that they are wrong. We can educate them, but not physically punish them.

“It is always our responsiblity to acknowledge where something has gone wrong, but never our right to punish.”

-The I Ching translated by Brian Browne Walker

What do we do with those who refuse to acknowledge a logical argument? We propose we send them back to school. (of course, schools need to be rethought as well, in their current state, they are nothing more than oppressive prisons or glorified nursery schools, but that’s another article.)

We must also be willing to accept the natural limits of being human. The sooner we recognize this, the better. Perhaps man was not meant to fly around the earth in man-made jets. Perhaps this is only reserved for the birds. Perhaps we weren’t meant to extract oil and pollute the air with industrialization. Perhaps nature will force us to obey these limits when the oil eventually runs out. (By the way, anyone who believes that the oil will not run out needs to go back to school now and get a logical education...run...run fast...get educate and save yourself).

As an aside, forgive me, but I must go on a short tangent here.The Avian Flu is Mother Nature’s way of laughing at our man-made borders. This is a natural problem, birds do not have to go through customs and immigration quarentine, they are truly free to go wherever they wish. The disease will affect men, women and children of any skin color, regardless of religious, moral belief or economic condition. Birds can spread this disease as they will, and man cannot do much to intervene aside from the ultimate and most arrogantly excercised form of oppression...the massive removal of life. Furthermore, it’s not just a problem for people in asia, it’s a problem for all humans around the earth. Mother nature is reminding us, that we are not so much above nature as an integrated part of it.

We are all born equal, but society teaches us to divide ourselves by rank (rooted in the ego) and to protect ourselves (rooted in fear). This is where the oppressive man-made chains of oppression are forged. To avoid these chains, we must take our ego down to size, realize that we are a part of nature, not above it...we are no better or worse than any other being on the planet, and we have nothing to fear, but fear itself. Life is life, and we have only to embrace all of it as it is comes our way, the “good” with the “bad”. Or perhaps I should say, the “pleasant” and the “not so pleasant” parts of life. For life is just that...life...and all of its experiences in and of themselves. Those that make the best of it using their freedom, and helping themselves and others to get the maximum experience through their freedom will be the happiest and free. Those who wish to oppress others, and voluntarily enslave themselves to the chains of others, will unfortunately be destined to be unhappy, and oppressed.


“’When the great tao fell into disregard, did benevolence and justice arise; when knowledge and cunning appeared, the great artificiality came into being.’ When the source of the tao dries up, men take to the expedients of humanity and justice but in vain. It is as with the fish: ‘When the pool dries up, fish makes room for fish upon the dry land, they moisten on another with damp breath, spray one another with foam from the jaws. But how much better are they off when they can forget one another , in the freedom of river and lake!’ Hence the right way is for men to live simply in the tao without artifice and constraint, without thought or knowledge of good and evil.”
(Tr. of Lao-tsu by Arthur Waley)-excerpt from “Socrates Buddha Confucious Jesus” by Karl Jaspers)

16 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

A few thoughts.

First, regarding the law, looking at U.S. legal history, the courts there are largely responsible for redefining the law, not in the interests of freedom (ie. preventing others from imposing on the freedoms of others) but in the interests of preventing freedom and protecting the interests of the wealthiest members of society. Naturally, this was not what happened in ever single case, but it did happen enough to redefine the legal standard in the U.S. to favour the overly wealthy. Then one might consider the U.S. tax code which was called "the most political law in the world" by tax lawyer Johnathan Blattmachr as he was attempting the show that the USSR and socialist Europe was guilty of that very thing. Of course, his response to this discovery was to use what he learned to further benefit the overly wealthy.

That said, I think you hit on something when you said freedom exists in nature. More specifically, it is implicitly understood in those who are not mentally ill. We know not to hurt others, not to kill others, not to take from others provided we are not brought up in an environment that, in one way or another condones such actions. There are places in the world today outside of the industrialised regime that do not face these problems, at least not to the extent we do in the "civilised" world of cluster bombs, condoned torture, economic blockades to starve people into doing what we want them to, state terrorism, etc.

With respect to the above, to abolish law in today's world is to invite hell, I think. To remove all boundaries in a world in which people are openly taught to idealise individualism, to worship the tycoon who builds an empire on the backs of communities of men, to agree to acceptable level of death (be it in the form of "collateral damage" or in the form of acceptable amounts of deadly pollutants) is to invite disaster.

Additionally, it is, I believe, physically impossible for some to be educated in today's world as you suggest. I think that many are too physically, biologically damaged from the pollutants of their own lives (I'm speaking of the psychological effects of pseudo-estrogens) to be able to ever come around. Such people feel that it is their right to continue their activities that harm others. For example, many truly despise Arabs for having the gall to have built their civilisation on top of their oil, or that it is their right to use the water they have stolen from others who are parched (think Israel) to water lawns and fill swimming pools.

Also, is not the order to be re-schooled a kind of prison? On whose authority would they be reschooled? Would this amount to nothing more than a re-eductaion camp? Questions to think about...

Regarding the legal system of today, there was never a time in known history or prehistory in which there were not rules (laws) preventing people from hurting others or endangering the community. To remove this barrier in the name of "freedom" because of current imperfections is to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Finally, the biggest problem I see with freedom is people not understanding what the word means. Many seem to think that the word means freedom from responsibility or freedom to hurt others. For an example, one need look no further than to look at anyone stupid enough to utter the words "smokers' right."

Wednesday, November 23, 2005 5:07:00 PM  
Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

As usual, thanks for the good comments DJEB. Just to set the record straight, I'm not suggesting we immediately throw out laws in the name of freedom, especially now, however, if society ever gets to the point where people are properly educated to think logically (and of course this would have to mean EVERYBODY) instead of being simply indoctrinated by religion, or trained to do jobs, and to think what they're supposed to...then society will be close to attaining freedom.

I believe that if EVERYONE was equal, and EVERYONE thought logically, then laws would cease to be necessary, for everyone would think through the long term results of their actions in a logical manner, and come to a conclusion that would naturally be ethical and moral, i.e. the smoker wouldn't smoke because they would logically think their action through, and come to the conclusion that it would be wrong because they would be endangering the life of someone else.

Furthermore, after I posted this, I was thinking about the statement, "Free Country." And I started thinking how rediculous it sounded. The word "Country" instantly brings up thoughts of boundries, arrogance, and opppression via the tyranny of the majority, or via the tyranny of the vocal/financial minority in most cases, the victor of a war, etc. etc. All countries have been built on the oppression of one kind or another, including the United States, just look at what the white man did to the Indians. It's also laughable to claim that "all men are created equal" for as I've stated before, men born into different economic situations are not equal in the least. They do not have equal opportunities.

So...again, perhaps I didn't state this strongly enough in the essay, but equality is a prime ingredient of freedom...that means economic equality, educational equality, physical equality...basically any kind of equality that you can think of...combine that with a sense of logic, and a feeling of compassion as opposed to rationalizations (i.e. excuses for behavior) and selfishness (wow...look at that...rationalizations for selfish behavior...sounds like a recipe for oppression), and then you're getting somewhere.

"As a policy, above all 'make the people prosperous.' The next most important thing is to 'educate them.'"
-Karl Jaspers (on Confucius) from "Socrates Buddha Confucius Jesus"

The question is...is it possible? If not possible, can't we all at least give it our best shot? Perhaps man is too emotional to be logical, perhaps man is too selfish, are we beyond trying to change? If we are going to change, it's going to have to come from within...from ourselves. We will have to lead by example...and hope that our actions spread like an epidemic. As Karl Jaspers further suggests in the same book quoted above, "Men were free to develop their potentialities."

I guess this is one reason why the practice of permaculture attracts me so much. We are developing our potentialities by reinforcing nature's abilites, which in turn support all life on earth. It gives people a chance to prosper while also educating them at the same time...and there's no central governing body, there's no need. Once the students understand the principles, they are free to create their own directives that will naturally benefit everyone...even if only indirectly. The key however, is that it must be practiced. Action is always the key.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005 7:03:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I would agree that were humanity, or at least one society, able to have a large majority think logically all the time before they act, then real freedom would be possible.

The problem, as you are well aware, is that we live in a world that rewards people for hurting others. DuPont can reap greater profits, for example, because they make the public pay the costs of their pollution. Josephine Six-pack can enjoy tootling around in her SUV causing greenhouse gas emissions, asthma, broncitis, ground water contamination, etc. because gasoline is not the $16 per gallon that it should be to pay for all the damage it does. The damage Josie does to the lives of others gets pushed off onto the victims. Moreover, Josie would get very angry were you to even suggest that she should pay for the harm she has inflicted on others.

The good news is that reality steps in. Josie is not only killing others, but herself as well. It sounds harsh, but if she kills herself, she can't kill others any longer. Nature steps in when any organism exceeds its bounds. We humans are in for a rude awakening that we fully deserve. With any luck, the surviving generations will have learned the lesson of the costs of the stupidity of their forebearers.

Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:42:00 AM  
Blogger Jez said...

Is Mother Nature an international fundamentalist terrorist?
Here's an example of freeom:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0127/p01s03-woeu.html
Btw, I agree with DJEB and with Scott!

Friday, November 25, 2005 9:59:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Regarding the traffic idea, huge-ass speed bumbs would work fine. So would closing out the inner city to any and all auto traffic outside of emergency vehicles.

Friday, November 25, 2005 10:15:00 PM  
Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

JEZ-glad to see you join in!

whoo-hoo...
I can't wait to see what happens. It does make a BIT of sense, but...I'll wait and see. If the streets of Tokyo are any clue as to what would happen in a "shared space" environment on a congested road...London's in for trouble.

DJEB has been witness to the numerous times oblivious idiots on bicycles have cruised through the "shared-space" of Tokyo sidewalks nearly ploughing me over...it's called a side-WALK people... I repeat...a side-WALK! If you're too much of a weenie to ride your bike on the street...then don't ride a bike at all...WALK for chrissake...but get off the friggin' sidewalk! WHEW!...there went a bit of steam.

On another note, I happened to notice that I failed to address DJEB's point about who would be the judge of people going back to school.

This would have to be decided democratically by the people living in the immediate society with each "said" mentally/educationally challenged individual who has not been able to grasp the skill of logic. The people making the decision would have to be those who live with/around said individual. I see no reason to have complete strangers judge a situation or people. Based on the decisions of this panel of true peers...the "accused" could be assigned a logic teacher/tutor who would live with them and follow them around 24-7 to point out all their illogical behavior and statements. A sort of Socrates-Angel/Pesterer...to follow you around saying "Stop That! THAT'S SILLY!" until the Logic-tutor feels that specific person has a grip on making their actions based on logica decisions.

-Just a brain fart...waddya think?

Friday, November 25, 2005 10:43:00 PM  
Blogger Jez said...

DJEB, a man after my own heart! Cars in the town centre are my pet hatred..grrr..well, actually what I really hate are city administrations which do all they can to favour parking but pretty much nought to limit traffic.Grrr again. I've been dithering setting up an angry-citizens-brigade, but the problem is, most people are out for their own apple as we say in our beautiful language!
As for the no-signs policy it seems to be working in wee Drachten. It may be a little premature in London or Tokyo...especially in Tokyo, eh?

Friday, November 25, 2005 11:40:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

No signs in Tokyo? Half the drivers here use the following logic:

It's __:__ on ___day, and I don't want to stop, and my driving instructor never taught me that I have to stop for this particular sign/light at this particular time, so... I'll ignore it.

In an answer to the traffic problem, just a handfull of Tyler Durden's Project Mayhem teams in strategic points in the city with spike belts could put an end to the traffic, if only for one day.

Monday, November 28, 2005 11:34:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Words that make us ponder, Alex. As for the constraints, though, they seem straight forward enough to me: you are not free to harm others. That may be straight forward, but it's not simple. It is the kind of thing that may leave you unfree to not act. In other words, one is not free to harm others through either action or inaction.

Friday, December 09, 2005 10:01:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Ah, the scourge of convenience - something that I've been working on in my head that I'll post to these pages soon. I'm sure we can both think of examples in which people have literally died for our convenience and comfort. We have various institutions set up to aid this - WTO, WB, IMF, USIEB, etc. - and the practice of empire to carry it out.

Fortunately, if you are the Alex I think you are, then you know a way out.

Friday, December 16, 2005 11:51:00 AM  
Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

First of all...my apologies for blowing off this blog for so long...'twas "the season,"

...and when I say that, I'm making reference to the holiday season, in which I take time off from slavery to the modern lifestyle and economy, and use it to make home-improvements (in both the physical and family/friend-sense) spending time with those that matter. This year we took it a step further by mutually refusing with my wife to not contribute to the "gift giving" part of X-mas. We decided it best and more "in the spirit" to not contribute to the pockets of someone who already has more than enough by buying gifts.

In response to Alex's comment on the addictive lifestyle...this is society's addiction to buying and selling useless and wasteful things that cost the world dearly...it doesn't HAVE to be our addiction...

I realize and accept the fact that we cannot help the world we were born into (almost on an hourly basis, I struggle with the desire to live in a sustainable way in a city that makes that goal virtually impossible by it's mere existence) however...

...we can do our best to "...make a better place" as one of my favorite musicians, Ben Harper, says,"...with our own two hands."

Again...the key (again) being to excercise our freedom to act.

We can change the world all at once...but little by little...we can do our own part.

We can only do our best. Be as free as we can, without harming others to the best of our ability.

Even Tibetan monks who go out of their way not to take the life of any creature on this earth..step on insects from time to time without their knowledge.

Some things are beyond our control...other things are. Therefore, we do what we can, when and where we can. We excercise whatever freedom we've got, when we've got it...to make the best of what we've got.

gothamimage...
I look forward to reading what you've got. I'm on my way now...I may not contribute tonight...but will probably do so in the future.

Sunday, January 15, 2006 9:51:00 PM  
Blogger 三八 said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Tuesday, February 09, 2010 1:53:00 PM  
Blogger 茂一 said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Thursday, April 01, 2010 1:51:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Sunday, May 02, 2010 2:16:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Friday, May 07, 2010 2:52:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home