Personal Blog Top Sites

Monday, May 09, 2005

A Word On Efficiency

There are a lot of people wasting a lot of precious time and energy in an attempt to “debunk” environmentalist’s warnings about global warming and the destruction of the environment. I think people would prefer to spend their time and energy toward a positive effect on the world, by not only spreading warnings of environmental destruction, but by studying and sharing or teaching the wonders of positive things such as sustainable development, clean energy, eco-design, Permaculture and so on.

I see no point in ignoring the warnings of people who have dedicated their life to the study of saving the planet.

The reason most often given for debunking the words of environmentalists is the inconvenience it supposedly causes to the economy (or, more accurately, the inconvenience it causes to major corporations who make their gross profits directly or in-directly through the destruction of the environment).

I believe that if you think through this rationale, most logical people will find that it’s simply shortsighted thinking. Of what use is a good economy in an uninhabitable world? Of what use is it to amass a great fortune for your family if the world the future generations inherit is impossible to live in?

My father always told me that if you borrow something, you should return it in better shape than when you got it. I like to keep this in mind when I think about this world I live in. This world is not mine to do with as I wish. This planet belongs to every living thing living on it. I am borrowing it. I should leave it in better condition than it in was when I arrived for the sake of future generations to come, specifically my children and their children.

It’s not just my responsibility it’s also my duty. If I wish to hasten the end of humanity, than I can take advantage of the worlds resources for my own selfish purposes, if I wish to aid the survival of humanity for as long as possible, I must think about sustainability, and conservation of nature.

To achieve this goal, we have to use our time and energy efficiently. We have to spend it in a positive way. We have to take action with our lives and use our words wisely. We must point our words in the right direction toward improving the world we live in, not in the downward spiral of destruction caused by careless reasoning and inefficiently wasting our time complaining about the inconvenience of environmentalists to the economy.

Let’s pretend for a moment that the Republican conservative argument is right, and that of all the dangers facing our environment, Global Warming doesn’t exist, and if it does, it’s not the fault of humans, nature taking it’s natural course for the better. What good does this knowledge do us?

Let’s remember the words of Seneca, “For even if you admit that they say all this in good faith, even if they guarantee the truth of their statements, whose mistakes will thereby be lessened? Whose passions restrained? Who will be made more free, more just, more magnanimous? Our Fabianus used to say that sometimes he wondered whether it was better not to be involved in any researches than to get entangled in these.”

To put Seneca’s words into context for today’s situation, I can say that the passions of the corporations will not be restrained, they shall be lit on fire, and they shall no longer have to care about the CO2 emissions that they spew into the air, their mistakes shall be lessened, and they shall be excused from the responsibility they have to clean up any messes they have so graciously given us in the name of profit. They will be made free to do as they wish without guilt, while we become enslaved to live in the poorer environment they create.

Saying we have nothing to worry about amounts to nothing more than denial, and denial is not a positive action. The first step to solving a problem is admitting that you have one. We, the people of this planet do have a problem and it’s people fighting against environmentalists, fighting against each other instead of working together in a positive way to better this world we all share.

These last three words are a key to solving many of the world’s problems. A shift in thinking is needed from “Us vs. Them” to “We vs. Ourselves”. By this, I mean that it is the fault of all humans that war exists. It is the fault of all humans that the environment is being destroyed. It is the fault of all humans that there is starvation or homelessness. We are all responsible. These things exist because we, the people, allow it to exist.

There is not just one evil person, or country, or company. Evil exists, because we all support it, we all allow it to happen.

A wise old Native American by the name of Rolling Thunder once said, “When enough people want peace, there will be peace.” We can expand this to say that when enough people want a better world, there will be a better world. But we have to be united. To be united, we have to start working together. We have to stop fighting the people who are trying to make things better, and start fighting the people who are trying to destroy it for their own selfish purposes. When I say fight them, I mean that we have to fight for their minds. We have to fight with the weapons of logic and truth in debate to get them on our side so we can all work together.

Furthermore, to be united, we must stop thinking of ourselves as competitors for the earth via our religion, our country, or economic status. We cannot all survive with this winner-loser competitive streak. We will either all lose in the end, or all win by uniting to create a better world.

Environmentalist David Suzuki, who was recently voted “greatest Canadian alive,” for his work for the environment stated in a recent interview that “The very definition of what it is to be human is that we were unique among all the other animals on the African plain in that we had foresight. Our survival strategy was foresight…we know clearly where we’re going, but we’re not even paying attention. So that’s the tragedy, we’ve turned our back on the very thing that was the key to our survival. “

Wasting our time on the denying of the dilapidated state of the environment, is turning our back on ourselves to run us all headlong and headstrong, like lemmings over a cliff. It is to shun our survival instinct. I can think of a million more pro-active ways to spend our time. The first would be to educate ourselves and each other to the dangers we face, and the second would be to take whatever action that lies in our power to avoid those dangers.

To do anything else, would simply be a waste of time, and a waste of this earth we inherited and share with each other and generations to come.

12 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

I kid you not, as administrator of this site I will delete your post with glee if it is off topic. This is clear enough for even people who misplace their own property to understand.

Thursday, May 12, 2005 12:29:00 AM  
Blogger Jez said...

anyone who finds themselves excluded from this site, is welcome to come and spew their hateful off topic posts at my site!
As usual Mr Meister goes straight to the point, no fussing around, no sir! I especially like the stuff about competition and winner-looser.
Oh, and you can be like St Thomas and believe in my translations when you see them. I'm just a lazy ****!

Thursday, May 12, 2005 5:48:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I agree wholeheartedly about "we the people" allowing these things to exist. As I am a firm globalist, it speaks to my nature. I also like this quote:
"My father always told me that if you borrow something, you should return it in better shape than when you got it. I like to keep this in mind when I think about this world I live in. This world is not mine to do with as I wish",

You must have a wonderful father to teach you such excellent and old fashioned values.

Thursday, May 12, 2005 8:18:00 AM  
Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

-This post was sent to me via email from somebody who was having problems for some reason posting a comment...

Nice job Scott, really, cannot but agree with the things you wrote. You
stressed the importance of fighting against the bloody motherfuckers
that set this world of us on the way to complete annihilation, and that's right.
Expecially if we considere their actual attitude to deny that the very problem exists. You were right as well when you wrote we have to use logic and truth to bring them on our side.
But that's the difficult point I think, and that's because we all know that every single one of those bastards responsible for the decisions that destroys the environment we live in
is hundred per cent aware of the mess he is doing. Simply, he/she/it
doesn't give a damn. It's terribly hard to convince someone that is better to have trees in their neighborhood than a golf club. Trees doesn't bring money
in, and are not cool, with all those leaves falling.I'm sure that's a lot
of work to be done to convince normal people like us that things are really going bad, and time is running out. So I am really worried when I read that in the US (which is where, even if we don't like it, things are decided) there are all these fucking corporations that spend huge amount of
money to erase the problem from public debate. This is really scaring. The more because they have the means to deliver their false messages. So to make my
point, the best thing is absolutely to spread the knowledge on how
things are really going, basing our arguments on matter of fact things , not that we lack data for that.
Logic and truth sshould be our only guns. But how nice would it be to
have one with the CEO of, let's say, Hallyburton, or Fox news. You,
him.....and a baseball bat......grooooooooovy!

-Matteo

Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:37:00 PM  
Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

Hey everyone, thanks for all the great comments, and compliments...it's comforting to know that other people out there agree.

To Matteo...I have to say, that although it's nice to perhaps fantasize about baseball bats being taken to those guys at Halliburton and Fox...it's that old survival instinct of foresight that stops me from doing so. First, I can imagine that it would just put my butt in jail, and I wouldn't be able to contribute to this blog anymore, and second, it wouldn't do much for the reputation of the cause...but, I must admit...it would probably feel good for awhile...however, it's a short-term versus long-term goal kind of thing.

As for your comment on the scariness of the corporations spending huge amounds of money to erase the problem from public debate...yes, it's scary...what's worse, is that a lot of it, believe it or not, is probably our own tax dollars. That isn't just scary...it makes me ill.

I also agree with you that we need to spread things as a matter of fact...and we definitely do NOT lack data for that. If you click on that hotlinked word "data" you should find the article that you sent me regarding just exactly that...thanks...it's a great read.

Laurenbove...
Thanks for visiting the site, and taking time to respond. "We the people" really do have a lot more responsibility in this world than we're ready to admit.
Also, the fact that you are a mother simply enhances my elation that you appreciate the words of my father.
Unfortunately, I have to say that it is precisely because of him that I wrote this article. Without going into too much detail and publicly embarrassing him, I will just say that he sent me an email one day praising Michael Crighton's fictional book "State of Fear" on the "myth" of global warming. And he was raving about it so as to make us all think it was a work of non-fiction...ranting about how awful it was that the "liberal" media has led us to believe such things. Anyway...it set me off and inspired the piece...and a rather nasty email response that I hope one-day he will forgive me for.

Jez-Don't worry about being a lazy ****...take your time, and do it right...and whenever you get a chance is fine by me. I'm sure you have your hands full with your own blog...and your own life. It will be nice to see these ramblings in another language someday...whenever that might happen, it doesn't really matter. Afterall, good things come to those who wait, right? Thanks for taking the time to read, and say nice things. Really wish you could be here in Tokyo to share in the new shipment of Riggwelter that should be coming in this summer...can't wait!!!

Thursday, May 12, 2005 10:28:00 PM  
Blogger Jez said...

my mouth waters...or should I say 'foams'?

Friday, May 13, 2005 2:01:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Scott,

The first thought that occurred to me was that the word "efficiency" as it is used in reference to the economy is a highly ideological term. So, by the economists' measure, speculating on currency in an effort to stagnate growth and drive up interests rates thereby threatening serious collapse as in Mexico or SE Asia is efficient functioning of the market; but a mother raising children is being so inefficient that her work not only goes unpaid, Reaganite cuts to family support force her out of that "inefficient" work early and back to more "efficient" pursuits. It is "efficient" that the average worker's wage peaked in 1973 in the U.S. and has yet to reach that level again, while the ratio of CEO pay to worker pay in the U.S. is 301:1.

More to the point, it is efficient (and highly rewarded) for a corporation to externalise as much of its operating costs as possible. Profit is greater if the public pays for the costs of pollution rather than industry. One might point out that a huge source of greenhouse gas is motorists and they, not industry, are responsible. Yet, how does one explain the shift in consumers from fuel-efficient compact cars to SUVs? (No, not safety. SUVs do very poorly in crashes as compared to cars.) The economist would say that it was consumer choice. Quite the opposite. Market theory holds that consumers in a market make rational choices based on the choices available. That so, why would a rational consumer choose an expensive vehicle that consumes expensive fuel at an incredible rate, tips over easily, does poorly in crash tests and handles poorly? The answer is advertising, the goal of which is to interfere with the rational choices of consumers (as even Adam Smith pointed out). So again, we come back to corporations.

Next, on the denial of global warming, we know the source of that: corporations again. As Ross Gelbspan in his article Snowed and Chris Mooney in his article Some Like It Hot point out, the funding for PR campaigns that attempt to cast doubt on the overwhelming consensus of climate scientists comes from corporations. (Funny how the word corporation keeps popping up.)

Finally, you entertain the fancy that the naysayers are correct. If they were and we still reduced greenhouse emissions, what would be the result? The result would be up to 5000 less deaths in Canada every year (the number of deaths attributable to air pollution there) and 310,000 less deaths in Europe. Sounds like we can’t go wrong in reducing air pollution.

Friday, May 13, 2005 9:45:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Also, did you say "liberal media"?

Friday, May 13, 2005 9:51:00 AM  
Blogger Scott A. Meister said...

DJEB...this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about when I mention making points with logic and fact.

Thanks for giving us a perfect example to follow. Beautifully done.

By the way, just so everyone knows...the "liberal media" is absolutely, positively, ANYTHING but...as DJEB's little collection on that hot-link sheds just the light needed on the subject.

Friday, May 13, 2005 6:02:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Groovy!

DJEB the tyrannical moderator.

Friday, May 20, 2005 12:27:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Rather on topic with respect to the environment and suggestions to replace fossil fuels with nuclear energy, I'd say. BB, we have a lot of underreported news on the site A Logical Voice, if you are interested.

The news has not been covered in North America accept by GNN and Rense, which are not part of the mainstream media, and a mention on the Yahoo newswire.

Sunday, May 22, 2005 12:11:00 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

This place needs a troll!

Two months and no new posts? Honestly.

Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:24:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home